Ticket #20 (new defect)

Opened 3 years ago

Last modified 8 months ago

potential testcase

Reported by: gunnar Owned by:
Priority: low Milestone: 3.8
Component: regressions Version:
Severity: normal Keywords:
Cc: patch: no

Description

This would be worth adding as a testcase:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnugo-devel/2005-09/msg00000.html

Attachments

blunder26.sgf (0.6 kB) - added by cisba 9 months ago.
blunder_add37_sgf26.sgf (0.5 kB) - added by cisba 9 months ago.
tactics09.sgf (0.6 kB) - added by cisba 8 months ago.
tactics1_add109.diff (0.5 kB) - added by cisba 8 months ago.
owl1_add397.diff (0.5 kB) - added by cisba 8 months ago.

Regression Results

Attachment Rev. PASS FAIL Nodes Status
owl1_add397.diff never tested
tactics1_add109.diff never tested

Change History

  Changed 3 years ago by arend

  • owner changed from gnugo to arend
  • status changed from new to assigned

  Changed 3 years ago by arend

  • owner arend deleted
  • status changed from assigned to new

  Changed 3 years ago by gunnar

  • component changed from source to regressions

Changed 9 months ago by cisba

Changed 9 months ago by cisba

follow-up: ↓ 5   Changed 9 months ago by gunnar

I don't think this test should go into blunder.tst since that is reserved for moves that are so bad that passing is better.

This is more a of a normal mistake. :-)

in reply to: ↑ 4 ; follow-up: ↓ 6   Changed 8 months ago by cisba

Replying to gunnar:

I don't think this test should go into blunder.tst since that is reserved for moves that are so bad that passing is better. This is more a of a normal mistake. :-)

Ok. Where to put it?

in reply to: ↑ 5 ; follow-up: ↓ 7   Changed 8 months ago by gunnar

Replying to cisba:

Replying to gunnar:

I don't think this test should go into blunder.tst since that is reserved for moves that are so bad that passing is better. This is more a of a normal mistake. :-)

Ok. Where to put it?

The big unsolved problem of computer science - The Naming of Things.

I don't have any particularly good place to suggest. There are only a few test files with a clear purpose, and I don't think it fits any of them. Maybe it could be added to strategy5.tst or tactics1.tst. Additionally a complementary "owl_attack N9" test could be added to owl1.tst.

in reply to: ↑ 6 ; follow-up: ↓ 8   Changed 8 months ago by cisba

Replying to gunnar:

Replying to cisba:

Replying to gunnar:

I don't think this test should go into blunder.tst since that is reserved for moves that are so bad that passing is better. This is more a of a normal mistake. :-)

Ok. Where to put it?

The big unsolved problem of computer science - The Naming of Things. I don't have any particularly good place to suggest. There are only a few test files with a clear purpose, and I don't think it fits any of them. Maybe it could be added to strategy5.tst or tactics1.tst. Additionally a complementary "owl_attack N9" test could be added to owl1.tst.

Sorry, I take the idea to add in blunder from the subject of the mail "Some homework : gnugo appreciation blunder".

Well, in my opinion is more about tactics then strategy, so I upload the diff for tactics1.tst, the sgf is renamed in tactics09.sgf, and finally the diff for owl1.tst also is added.

Changed 8 months ago by cisba

Changed 8 months ago by cisba

Changed 8 months ago by cisba

in reply to: ↑ 7   Changed 8 months ago by gunnar

Replying to cisba:

Well, in my opinion is more about tactics then strategy, so I upload the diff for tactics1.tst, the sgf is renamed in tactics09.sgf, and finally the diff for owl1.tst also is added.

The owl test result looks wrong. K6 and K9 should be miai for making easy life for N9, regardless of the fate of O5, i.e. there is no attack.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.