Ticket #20 (new defect)
potential testcase
| Reported by: | gunnar | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | low | Milestone: | 3.9.x |
| Component: | regressions | Version: | |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | patch: | no |
Description
This would be worth adding as a testcase:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnugo-devel/2005-09/msg00000.html
Attachments
-
blunder26.sgf
(621 bytes) -
added by cisba 4 years ago.
-
blunder_add37_sgf26.sgf
(558 bytes) -
added by cisba 4 years ago.
-
tactics09.sgf
(621 bytes) -
added by cisba 4 years ago.
-
tactics1_add109.diff
(531 bytes) -
added by cisba 4 years ago.
-
owl1_add397.diff
(529 bytes) -
added by cisba 4 years ago.
Regression Results
| Attachment | Rev. | PASS | FAIL | Nodes | Status | |
| owl1_add397.diff | never tested | |||||
| tactics1_add109.diff | never tested |
Change History
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by arend
- Owner changed from gnugo to arend
- Status changed from new to assigned
comment:4 follow-up: ↓ 5 Changed 4 years ago by gunnar
I don't think this test should go into blunder.tst since that is reserved for moves that are so bad that passing is better.
This is more a of a normal mistake. :-)
comment:5 in reply to: ↑ 4 ; follow-up: ↓ 6 Changed 4 years ago by cisba
Replying to gunnar:
I don't think this test should go into blunder.tst since that is reserved for moves that are so bad that passing is better.
This is more a of a normal mistake. :-)
Ok. Where to put it?
comment:6 in reply to: ↑ 5 ; follow-up: ↓ 7 Changed 4 years ago by gunnar
Replying to cisba:
Replying to gunnar:
I don't think this test should go into blunder.tst since that is reserved for moves that are so bad that passing is better.
This is more a of a normal mistake. :-)
Ok. Where to put it?
The big unsolved problem of computer science - The Naming of Things.
I don't have any particularly good place to suggest. There are only a few test files with a clear purpose, and I don't think it fits any of them. Maybe it could be added to strategy5.tst or tactics1.tst. Additionally a complementary "owl_attack N9" test could be added to owl1.tst.
comment:7 in reply to: ↑ 6 ; follow-up: ↓ 8 Changed 4 years ago by cisba
Replying to gunnar:
Replying to cisba:
Replying to gunnar:
I don't think this test should go into blunder.tst since that is reserved for moves that are so bad that passing is better.
This is more a of a normal mistake. :-)
Ok. Where to put it?
The big unsolved problem of computer science - The Naming of Things.
I don't have any particularly good place to suggest. There are only a few test files with a clear purpose, and I don't think it fits any of them. Maybe it could be added to strategy5.tst or tactics1.tst. Additionally a complementary "owl_attack N9" test could be added to owl1.tst.
Sorry, I take the idea to add in blunder from the subject of the mail "Some homework : gnugo appreciation blunder".
Well, in my opinion is more about tactics then strategy, so I upload the diff for tactics1.tst, the sgf is renamed in tactics09.sgf, and finally the diff for owl1.tst also is added.
comment:8 in reply to: ↑ 7 Changed 4 years ago by gunnar
Replying to cisba:
Well, in my opinion is more about tactics then strategy, so I upload the diff for tactics1.tst, the sgf is renamed in tactics09.sgf, and finally the diff for owl1.tst also is added.
The owl test result looks wrong. K6 and K9 should be miai for making easy life for N9, regardless of the fate of O5, i.e. there is no attack.
